The dialectics of accuracy arguments for probabilism

Scoring rules measure the deviation between a credence assignment and reality. Probabilism holds that only those assignments satisfy axioms of probability are rationally admissible. Accuracy-based arguments for probabilism observe given certain conditions on scoring rule, score any non-probability is dominated by probability. The in we will consider include propriety: claim expected accuracy p not beaten other c lights if I argue think through how non-probabilist can respond to pragmatic probabilism, expect accept condition stronger than propriety same reasons probabilist gives propriety, but this incompatible with needs run argument. This makes it unlikely probabilist’s argument be compelling.